Despite their successes, some companies seem to not make sense no matter how many times they are explained to me or their markets are outlined or they are championed by VCs or Wall Street or whoever. One of my buddies described Groupon (or Living Social etc) as "voluntary spam," and not only do I not know anyone that has purchased a Groupon, I don't know anyone who enjoys getting their emails. I'm technically a subscriber to their mailing list, but it's the first email I delete in the morning and I don't look at any of the offers. The company is obviously doing something right, despite pulling their IPO, but I simply do not understand how the product itself has proven to be a hit when it seems to be a novelty at best and annoying at worst.Grouper on the other hand is a company that is almost too intuitive to not have been created already. A friend originally introduced me to the concept a couple months ago and instantly it seemed like a company that, if done properly, would achieve tremendous scale. Early results are that it has been done properly.
The basic way it works is as follows:
1. You log into Grouper through your Facebook
2. Grouper looks for people of the opposite sex “taking into account age / education / personalities / interests / attractiveness”
3. Sets you and a group of two friends up with another group of three with similar interests for a dinner / night out
Conceptually it tries to pair you with friends you don't yet know.
No comments:
Post a Comment